Marty and Karla Grant

!NOTES:Marty Grant's 4th Great Grand Uncle.;


!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/lane/


!NOTES:Osborne is a proven child of Osborne Lane Sr. as named in Osborne's 1840 estate records. Sellers did not mention him. He was probably forgotten since he left Marion pretty early, in fact, before Mr. Sellers was born.;


!NOTE:B/D & D/D from Debbie ---, found on Osborne's TS in Barnwell Co, SC;


!CENSUS:1790 Georgetown Dist., SC, Prince George Parish, p. 507
Osborn Lane age 16+ (bef 1774) 3-4-3-0-0
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
3 males 16+ (bef 1774) = 1. Osborne Lane (1750/55)
" males 16+ (bef 1774) = 2. Joseph (c1770) son
" males 16+ (bef 1774) = 3. Thomas (c1770/74) son
4 males 0-15 (1774/1790) = 1. Robert Lane (c1780/84) son
" males 0-15 (1774/1790) = 2. Osborne Lane (1789) son
" males 0-15 (1774/1790) = 3. James Lane (c1784) son
" males 0-15 (1774/1790) = 4. Alexander Lane (1787) son
3 females (no ages) = 1. Hepsabeth Crawford Lane (1752) wife
" females (no ages) = 2. Elizabeth Lane (1755/74) dau
" females (no ages) = 3. Keziah Lane (c1784/90) dau;


!CENSUS:1800 Marion Dist., SC p. 459/803
Osborn Lane age 45+ (bef 1755) 23001-01001-0-0
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 45+ (bef 1755) = Osborne Lane (1750/55)
3 males 10-15 (1784/90) = 1. Osborne Lane (1789) son
" males 10-15 (1784/90) = 2. James Lane (c1784) son
" males 10-15 (1784/90) = 3. Alexander Lane (1787) son
2 males 0-9 (1790/1800) = 1. Stephen C. Lane (c1794/1800) son
" males 0-9 (1790/1800) = 2. David Lane (c1790/1800) son
1 female 45+ (bef 1755) = Hepsabeth Crawford Lane (1752) wife
1 female 10-15 (1784/90) = Keziah Lane (c1784/90) dau
*Some of Osborne's older sons don't appear to be at home, but aren't listed as heads of household either: Joseph (c1770), Robert (c1780/84).;


!CENSUS:1810 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 134
Osborn Lane age 26-44 (1765/84) 10010-20100-0-0
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 26-44 (1765/1784) = Osborne Lane (1789)
1 male 0-9 (1800/1810) = Osborne Lane (Jr) (c1808) son
1 female 16-25 (1784/1794) = Mary --- Lane (c1790), wife
2 females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 1. Charlotte Caroline Lane (c1808) daughter
" females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 2. Nancy Lane (c1810) daughter;


!CENSUS:1820 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 15
Osburn Lane age 26-44 (1775/94) 310010-00101-0. Slaves=1000-0100.
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 26-44 (1775/1794) = Osborne Lane (1789)
1 male 10-15 (1804/1810) = Osborne Lane (Jr) (c1808) son
3 males 0-9 (1810/1820)= 1. Bryant Lane (c1811) son
" males 0-9 (1810/1820)= 2. Son? (1815/20)
" males 0-9 (1810/1820)= 3. Son? (1815/20)
1 female age 45+ (bef 1775) = Mary --- Lane (c1790) wife*
1 female 16-25 (1794/1804) = Daughter**
Slaves:
1 male 0-13 (1806/1820) = ?
1 female 14-25 (1794/1806) = ?
* Mary doesn't fit age-wise, but must be her unless he was married more than once.
** Could be Nancy (c1810), but doesn't fit nor Charlotte (c1808) who doesn't seem to be listed.;


!CENSUS:1830 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 174
Osburn Lane age 30-39 (1790/1800) 112101-2011101. Slaves=110000-211000.
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 30-39 (1790/1800) = Osborne Lane (1789)
1 male 15-19 (1810/1815) = Bryant Lane (c1811) son
2 males 10-14 (1815/1820) = 1. Son? (1815/20)
" males 10-14 (1815/1820) = 2. Son? (1815/20)
1 male 5-9 (1820/1825) = Andrew J. Lane (c1822) son
1 male 0-4 (1825/1830) = Joseph Lane (c1826) son
1 female 40-49 (1780/1790) = Mary --- Lane (c1790) wife
1 female 20-29 (1800/1810) = Charlotte Caroline Lane (c1808) daughter
1 female 15-19 (1810/1815) = Daughter?
1 female 10-14 (1815/1820) = Mary Lane (c1816) daughter
2 females 0-4 (1825/1830) = 1. Elizabeth Lane (c1825) daughter
" females 0-4 (1825/1830) = 2. Daughter?
Slaves:
1 male 10-23 (1805/1820) = ?
1 male 0-9 (1820/1830) = ?
1 female 24-35 (1793/1805) = ?
1 female 10-23 (1805/1820) = ?
2 females 0-9 (1820/1830) = 1. ?
" females 0-9 (1820/1830) = 2. ?;


!CENSUS:1840 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 215
Osborn Lane Sr age 50-59 (1780/90) 00020001-00300001. Slaves=230000-232000.
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 50-59 (1780/1790) = Osborne Lane (1789)
2 males 15-19 (1820/1825) = 1. Andrew J. Lane (c1822) son
" males 15-19 (1820/1825) = 2. Joseph Lane (c1826)
1 female 50-59 (1780/1790) = Mary --- Lane (c1790) wife
3 females 10-14 (1825/1830) = 1. Elizabeth Lane (c1825) daughter
" females 10-14 (1825/1830) = 2. Daughter?
" females 10-14 (1825/1830) = 3. Sarah Ann Lane (c1831) daughter
Slaves:
3 males 10-23 (1815/1830) = 1. ?
" males 10-23 (1815/1830) = 2. ?
" males 10-23 (1815/1830) = 3. ?
2 males 0-9 (1830/1840) = 1. ?
" males 0-9 (1830/1840) = 2. ?
2 females 24-35 (1803/1815) = 1. ?
" females 24-35 (1803/1815) = 2. ?
3 females 10-23 (1815/1830) = 1. ?
" females 10-23 (1815/1830) = 2. ?
" females 10-23 (1815/1830) = 3. ?
2 females 0-9 (1830/1840) = 1. ?
" females 0-9 (1830/1840) = 2. ?;


!NAMED-PROBATE ROLL # 426 Osburn Land (sic) 22 Jun 1840. James Lane.
...
10 Heirs $313.93 each up to Feb 1842.
In court of Ordinary James Lane, applicant, vs.
Jno Lane
Thos Lane
John Blackman
Joseph Lane
Robert Lane
Osborne Lane
Saml Smith
Alexd Lane
Stephen Lane
Saml Smith (sic)
Alexd Lane (sic).
Joseph Lane, Robert Lane, Osborne Lane, and Stephen Lane reside without the state.
...
* From "Marion County Probate Records" Volume 1, Lucille Utley, Danny Smith. Three Rivers Historical Society. 1985.


!NAMED:30 Jun 1840 Marion Dist, SC Ordinary's Real Estate Book 1826-1843 pg 119 Osborne LANE's Real Estate. Valuation: Joseph BASS, John BRYAN and Woodward MANNING recommend sale of land and value it at less than $1000. 30 Jun 1840. Summons: James LANE, applicant. Summons to John LANE, Robert LANE, Osborne LANE, Samuel SMITH, Alexander LANE, Stephen LANE, legal heirs and representatives, to appear in Court for division of land in Marion District on Buck Swamp, bounded by lands of estate of Daniel PLATT, John MANNING, John LEE, Barney WATSON, John TURBEVILLE and Joseph BASS, etc. James LANE Sr, John BLACKMAN andn Joseph LANE also in second list of heirs. Notice to absent defendants: Joseph, Robert, Osborne and Stephen LANE. 6 Jul 1840. John LANE Sr, Thomas LANE, John BLACKMAN, S. SMITH Jr and Alexander LANE consent to sale. 7 Jul 1840. Order of Sale Tract of 800 acres on Buck Swamp as previously described. 5 Nov 1840 sold to Samuel SMITH Jr for $2006. Decr 7 1840.;


!WILL: 8 Mar 1841 Barnwell Co., SC Will Book D, p. 61 proven 1844
Osborn Lain ...
Wife: Mary
Son Osborn
Son Andrew Jackson
son Joseph
son Bryant
dau Nancy wife of William Fail
dau Sarah
dau Betsey
dau Martha
dau Mary wife of Joel McMillan
Execs: Son Osborn, George Arterberry
Above from "The Ancestry and Known Descendants of Joseph Lane (1770-1850) of Marion County, South Carolina and Simpson County, Mississippi", Marilyn Lane Sirmon, William Arnold Sirmon, Privately published, 1986.

!NOTE:D/D from Debbie per TS in Barnwell "d 1866 age 77".


!CENSUS:1800;


!CENSUS:1810 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 134
Osborn Lane age 26-44 (1765/84) 10010-20100-0-0
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 26-44 (1765/1784) = Osborne Lane (1789)
1 male 0-9 (1800/1810) = Osborne Lane (Jr) (c1808) son
1 female 16-25 (1784/1794) = Mary --- Lane (c1790), wife
2 females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 1. Nancy Lane (1800/10) daughter
" females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 2. Charlotte Caroline Lane (c1808) daughter;


!CENSUS:1820 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 15
Osburn Lane age 26-44 (1775/94) 310010-00101-0. Slaves=1000-0100.
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 26-44 (1775/1794) = Osborne Lane (1789)
1 male 10-15 (1804/1810) = Osborne Lane (Jr) (c1808) son
3 males 0-9 (1810/1820)= 1. Bryant Lane (c1811) son
" males 0-9 (1810/1820)= 2. Son?
" males 0-9 (1810/1820)= 3. Son?
1 female age 45+ (bef 1775) = Mary --- Lane (c1790) wife?*
1 female 16-25 (1794/1804) = Nancy Lane (c1800/04) daughter**
Slaves:
1 male 0-13 (1806/1820) = ?
1 female 14-25 (1794/1806) = ?
* Mary doesn't fit age-wise, but must be her unless he was married more than once.
** Could be Nancy (1800/10), but doesn't fit for Charlotte (c1808) who doesn't seem to be listed.;


!CENSUS:1830 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 174
Osburn Lane age 30-39 (1790/1800) 112101-2011101. Slaves=110000-211000.
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 30-39 (1790/1800) = Osborne Lane (1789)
1 male 15-19 (1810/1815) = Bryant Lane (c1811) son
2 males 10-14 (1815/1820) = 1. Son? (1815/20)
" males 10-14 (1815/1820) = 2. Son? (1815/20)
1 male 5-9 (1820/1825) = Andrew J. Lane (c1822) son
1 male 0-4 (1825/1830) = Joseph Lane (c1826) son
1 female 40-49 (1780/1790) = Mary --- Lane (c1790) wife
1 female 20-29 (1800/1810) = Charlotte Caroline Lane (c1808) daughter
1 female 15-19 (1810/1815) = Daughter?
1 female 10-14 (1815/1820) = Mary Lane (c1820) daughter
2 females 0-4 (1825/1830) = 1. Elizabeth Lane (c1825) daughter
" females 0-4 (1825/1830) = 2. Daughter?
Slaves:
1 male 10-23 (1805/1820) = ?
1 male 0-9 (1820/1830) = ?
1 female 24-35 (1793/1805) = ?
1 female 10-23 (1805/1820) = ?
2 females 0-9 (1820/1830) = 1. ?
" females 0-9 (1820/1830) = 2. ?;


!CENSUS:1840 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 215
Osborn Lane Sr age 50-59 (1780/90) 00020001-00300001. Slaves=230000-232000.
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 50-59 (1780/1790) = Osborne Lane (1789)
2 males 15-19 (1820/1825) = 1. Andrew J. Lane (c1822) son
" males 15-19 (1820/1825) = 2. Joseph Lane (c1826)
1 female 50-59 (1780/1790) = Mary --- Lane (c1790) wife
3 females 10-14 (1825/1830) = 1. Elizabeth Lane (c1825) daughter
" females 10-14 (1825/1830) = 2. Daughter?
" females 10-14 (1825/1830) = 3. Sarah Ann Lane (c1831) daughter
Slaves:
3 males 10-23 (1815/1830) = 1. ?
" males 10-23 (1815/1830) = 2. ?
" males 10-23 (1815/1830) = 3. ?
2 males 0-9 (1830/1840) = 1. ?
" males 0-9 (1830/1840) = 2. ?
2 females 24-35 (1803/1815) = 1. ?
" females 24-35 (1803/1815) = 2. ?
3 females 10-23 (1815/1830) = 1. ?
" females 10-23 (1815/1830) = 2. ?
" females 10-23 (1815/1830) = 3. ?
2 females 0-9 (1830/1840) = 1. ?
" females 0-9 (1830/1840) = 2. ?;


!NAMED-WILL: 8 Mar 1841 Barnwell Co., SC Will Book D, p. 61 proven 1844
Osborn Lain ...
Wife: Mary
Son Osborn
Son Andrew Jackson
son Joseph
son Bryant
dau Nancy wife of William Fail
dau Sarah
dau Betsey
dau Martha
dau Mary wife of Joel McMillan
Execs: Son Osborn, George Arterberry
Above from "The Ancestry and Known Descendants of Joseph Lane (1770-1850) of Marion County, South Carolina and Simpson County, Mississippi", Marilyn Lane Sirmon, William Arnold Sirmon, Privately published, 1986.


!CENSUS:1850 Barnwell Dist., SC America # 1732/1732
Polly Lane 60 $- SC;


!CENSUS:1860 Barnwell Dist., SC Springtown PO # 408/408
William B. Chitty 36 Farming $3460/2628 SC
Elizabeth 33
Mary A. 7
Joseph M. 1
Mary Lane 70 $-/1020
* How is Mary related to this family?;

!NOTES:Apparently Charlotte Caroline was not named in her father's Will, but she is named in an 1844 deed as an heir to Osborne Lane's estate. That would be her grandfather Osborne, the deed does not say who her father was. However, she was living with Osborne (III) (her brother) in 1860, so that seems to cement her tie to Osborne (Jr). On the other hand she *could* be a child of Robert Lane instead.;


!CENSUS:1810 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 134
Osborn Lane age 26-44 (1765/84) 10010-20100-0-0
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 26-44 (1765/1784) = Osborne Lane (1789)
1 male 0-9 (1800/1810) = Osborne Lane (Jr) (c1808) son
1 female 16-25 (1784/1794) = Mary --- Lane (c1790), wife
2 females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 1. Nancy A. Lane (1800/10) daughter
" females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 2. Charlotte Caroline Lane (c1808) daughter;


!CENSUS:1820 x
x doesn't seem to be with parents.;


!CENSUS:1830 Barnwell Dist., SC p. 174
Osburn Lane age 30-39 (1790/1800) 112101-2011101. Slaves=110000-211000.
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 30-39 (1790/1800) = Osborne Lane (1789)
1 male 15-19 (1810/1815) = Bryant Lane (c1811) son
2 males 10-14 (1815/1820) = 1. Son? (1815/20)
" males 10-14 (1815/1820) = 2. Son? (1815/20)
1 male 5-9 (1820/1825) = Andrew J. Lane (c1822) son
1 male 0-4 (1825/1830) = Joseph Lane (c1826) son
1 female 40-49 (1780/1790) = Mary --- Lane (c1790) wife
1 female 20-29 (1800/1810) = Charlotte Caroline Lane (c1808) daughter
1 female 15-19 (1810/1815) = Daughter?
1 female 10-14 (1815/1820) = Mary Lane (c1820) daughter
2 females 0-4 (1825/1830) = 1. Elizabeth Lane (c1825) daughter
" females 0-4 (1825/1830) = 2. Daughter?
Slaves:
1 male 10-23 (1805/1820) = ?
1 male 0-9 (1820/1830) = ?
1 female 24-35 (1793/1805) = ?
1 female 10-23 (1805/1820) = ?
2 females 0-9 (1820/1830) = 1. ?
" females 0-9 (1820/1830) = 2. ?;


!CENSUS:1840 x
x not with parents.;


!DEED: 5 Feb 1844 Marion Co., SC Book T page 5 Power of Attorney
George Bates and Martha his wife
Andrew Bick (Beck) and Elizabeth his wife
and Charlotte Lain (all of Barnwell District)
to appoint David Lain their true and lawful attorney
... due from estate of Osborne Lane late of Marion District, deceased...
5 Feb 1844
Wit: Joseph N. Baile, Joseph Lain
... Joseph Lain saw Charlotte Caroline Lane sign ...
... Joseph N. Baile saw George W. Bates & Martha A. Bates and Andrew Dick and Elizabeth Dick sign ...;


!CENSUS:1850 Barnwell Dist., SC # 654/654
Andrew Beck 30 Planter $- SC
Eliz 25
Joyce 5
Mary 9
Thos 5/12
Charlotte Lane 50;


!CENSUS:1860 Barnwell Dist., SC # 5/5
Osborn Lane, 51 Farming, $10000/9700 SC
Rhoda B. 53
Charlotte, 52;


!CENSUS:1870 x