| Notes |
- !NOTES:Marty Grant's 4th Great Grand Uncle.;
!REFERENCE:
http://www.martygrant.com/
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/lane/
!NOTES:John is a proven son of Osborne Lane as named in Osborne's 1840 estate records. Sellers also listed him as a son, probably the oldest.;
!NOTES:I found no mention of John Lane in the early deed books (through the early 1850's), so he apparently never owned land in Marion District. However, he did have slaves in 1800, 1830 and 1840, but I found no deeds relating to them either, so perhaps they weren't his own, but managed by him for someone else, or hired out to him.;
!CENSUS:1790 Georgetown Dist., SC Prince Frederick Parish. p. 500
John Lane age 16+ (bef 1774) 1-2-2-4-0
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 16+ (bef 1774) = John Lane (1765/70)
2 males 0-15 (1774/90) = 1. Son?
" males 0-15 (1774/90) = 2. Son?
2 females no ages = 1. Mary (---) Lane (c1775) wife
" females no ages = 2. Daughter?
4 Other Free Persons = 1. ?
" Other Free Persons = 2. ?
" Other Free Persons = 3. ?
" Other Free Persons = 4. ?
* It is entirely possible this is a different John Lane, not the son of Osborne Lane.;
!CENSUS:1800 Georgetown Dist., SC Winyaw County, p. 754/63(68?)
John Lane age 26-44 (1755/74) 31010-11011-0-7
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 26-44 (1755/1774) = John Lane (1765/70)
1 male 10-15 (1784/1790) = Son?
3 males 0-9 (1790/1800) = 1. Son?
" males 0-9 (1790/1800) = 2. Son?
" males 0-9 (1790/1800) = 3. Son?
1 female 45+ (bef 1755) = Mother? Mother-in-law?
1 female 26-44 (1755/1774) = Mary (---) Lane (c1775) wife
1 female 10-15 (1784/1790) = Daughter?
1 female 0-9 (1790/1800) = Daughter?
7 Slaves (no ages or sex given) = 1. ?
" Slaves (no ages or sex given) = 2. ?
" Slaves (no ages or sex given) = 3. ?
" Slaves (no ages or sex given) = 4. ?
" Slaves (no ages or sex given) = 5. ?
" Slaves (no ages or sex given) = 6. ?
" Slaves (no ages or sex given) = 7. ?
* Peter Lane (1774/84) next door.
** Still not certain if this is the same John Lane, son of Osborne Lane.
*** Where did John get 7 slaves? He had none in 1790, nor any in 1810.;
!CENSUS:1810 Marion Dist., SC p. 83
John Lane age 26-44 (1765/84) 00010-51010-0-0
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 26-44 (1765/1784) = John Lane (1765/70)
1 female 26-44 (1765/1784) = Mary (---) Lane (c1775) wife
1 female 10-15 (1794/1800) = Daughter?
5 females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 1. Daughter?
" females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 2. Daughter?
" females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 3. Daughter?
" females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 4. Daughter?
" females 0-9 (1800/1810) = 5. Mahala Lane (c1810) daughter;
!CENSUS:1820 Marion Dist., SC p. 62
John Lane age 45+ (bef 1775) 200001-11301-0-0
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 45+ (bef 1775) = John Lane (1765/70)
2 males 0-9 (1810/1820) = 1. John G. Lane (c1813) son
" males 0-9 (1810/1820) = 2. Son?
1 female 45+ (bef 1775) = Mary (---) Lane (c1775) wife
3 females 16-25 (1794/1804) = 1. Daughter?
" females 16-25 (1794/1804) = 2. Daughter?
" females 16-25 (1794/1804) = 3. Daughter?
1 female 10-15 (1804/1810) = Mahala Lane (c1810) daughter
1 female 0-9 (1810/1820) = Sarah Lane (c1820) daughter;
!CHURCH:Sep 1829 Catfish Church Marion Dist, SC (now Dillon) ... Dismissed by letter to build up Antioch Church ... John LANE ... Mary Lane, Frances Lane, Mary Lane Jr, Martha Lane ...
* Don't know where I found this. It may have been published in an edition of the Pee Dee Queue or online somewhere, or perhaps was shared with me by someone. If anyone knows please remind me so I can give proper credit.;
!CENSUS:1830 Marion Dist., SC p. 31
John Lane age 60-69 (1760/70) 002000001-01021001,
Slaves=000000-100000
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 60-69 (1760/70) = John Lane (1765/70)
2 males 10-14 (1815/20) = 1. John G. Lane (c1813) son
" males 10-14 (1815/20) = 2. Son?
1 female 50-59 (1770/80) = Mary (---) Lane (c1775) wife
1 female 20-29 (1800/10) = Daughter? (1800/04)
2 females 15-19 (1810/15) = 1. Mahala Lane (c1810) daughter
" females 15-19 (1810/15) = 2. Daughter?
1 female 5-9 (1820/1825) = Sarah Lane (c1820) daughter;
Slaves:
1 female 0-9 (1820/1830) = ?;
!CENSUS:1840 Marion Dist., SC p. 170
John Lane age 70-79 (1760/70) 0000100001-000100001,
Slaves=000000-010000
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1 male 70-79 (1760/70) = John Lane (1765/70)
1 male 20-29 (1810/20) = John G. Lane (c1813) son
1 female 60-69 (1770/80) = Mary (---) Lane (c1775) wife
1 female 15-19 (1820/25) = Sarah Lane (c1820) daughter
Slaves:
1 female 10-23 (1815/30) = ?;
!NAMED-PROBATE ROLL # 426 Osburn Land (sic) 22 Jun 1840. James Lane.
...
10 Heirs $313.93 each up to Feb 1842.
In court of Ordinary James Lane, applicant, vs.
Jno Lane
Thos Lane
John Blackman
Joseph Lane
Robert Lane
Osborne Lane
Saml Smith
Alexd Lane
Stephen Lane
Saml Smith (sic)
Alexd Lane (sic).
Joseph Lane, Robert Lane, Osborne Lane, and Stephen Lane reside without the state.
...
* From "Marion County Probate Records" Volume 1, Lucille Utley, Danny Smith. Three Rivers Historical Society. 1985.
!NAMED:30 Jun 1840 Marion Dist, SC Ordinary's Real Estate Book 1826-1843 pg 119 Osborne LANE's Real Estate. Valuation: Joseph BASS, John BRYAN and Woodward MANNING recommend sale of land and value it at less than $1000. 30 Jun 1840. Summons: James LANE, applicant. Summons to John LANE, Robert LANE, Osborne LANE, Samuel SMITH, Alexander LANE, Stephen LANE, legal heirs and representatives, to appear in Court for division of land in Marion District on Buck Swamp, bounded by lands of estate of Daniel PLATT, John MANNING, John LEE, Barney WATSON, John TURBEVILLE and Joseph BASS, etc. James LANE Sr, John BLACKMAN andn Joseph LANE also in second list of heirs. Notice to absent defendants: Joseph, Robert, Osborne and Stephen LANE. 6 Jul 1840. John LANE Sr, Thomas LANE, John BLACKMAN, S. SMITH Jr and Alexander LANE consent to sale. 7 Jul 1840. Order of Sale Tract of 800 acres on Buck Swamp as previously described. 5 Nov 1840 sold to Samuel SMITH Jr for $2006. Decr 7 1840.;
!CENSUS:1850 Marion Dist., SC # 1280/1285
John Lane, 90 M Farmer, $- Marion
Mary, 75
Mahaly, 40
Sarah, 30;
!CENSUS:1850 Slave Schedule - Marion Dist., SC x
x John Lane was not listed.;
!CENSUS:1860 x
x Probably deceased.;
!NOTES:Antioch Baptist Church Minutes, Undated Membership Roll:
... many names ...
John Lane died 1867*
Contributed by William Snipes, 1999
http://sciway3.net/proctor/marion/church/Antioch_Baptist.html
* If this same John Lane, then probably should say 1857 instead, though it may be some other John Lane.
!REFERENCE: A History of Marion County, South Carolina From Its Earliest Times to the Present, 1901, by W. W. Sellers, Esq., of the Marion Bar. 1902. pp. 386-395
...
Osborne Lane married a Miss Crawford, a sister of old James Crawford, of Spring Branch-I suppose, older than her brother. The Crawfords were quite respectable in that day and have continued to be so down to the present time. The fruits of the marriage, as known, were eight sons, John, Thomas, Alexander, James, Robert, David, Stephen and William, and two daughters, Kesiah and Elizabeth.
...
Of the sons of old Osborne Lane, it is not known which of the eight was the older— I think, however, John, who was a very old man in 1840 (the year old man Osborne died) . John Lane had but one son, John G. Lane; don't know who his mother was ; John G. Lane married, I think, a Miss Johnson ; they had but one child, a daughter; don't know what became of her; John G. Lane died years ago, was an excellent man and good citizen. ;
|
1770 - 1860 (90 years)
