| Notes |
- !NOTES:Marty Grant's 4th Great Grand Uncle, if he is indeed a son of John & Mary Ann, which is not proven;
!NOTES:See my web page for more information on this family:
http://www.martygrant.com/genealogy/stewart/stewart-john-mary-macon-nc.html
!CENSUS:1790;
!CENSUS:1800 * See notes below with analysis of potential matches in 1800.
!CENSUS:1810 Haywood Co., NC p 200
John Stuart 11010-31010-0-0
My analysis (who each person *might* be)
1m 26-44 (1765/1784) John Stewart
1m 10-15 (1794/1800) Son?
1m 0-9 (1800/1810).. Son?
1f 26-44 (1765/1784) Wife?
1f 10-15 (1794/1800) Daughter?
3f 0-9 (1800/1810).. 1. Daughter?
.................... 2. Daughter?
.................... 3. Daughter?
!CENSUS:1820;
!CENSUS:1830;
!CENSUS:1840;
!NOTES:1800 CENSUS:
Judging by his two children in 1810 who are aged 10-15 (born ca 1794/1800), John and wife would have married prior to 1800.
Where is he on the 1800 census? Potential matches in western NC:
1800 Cabarrus Co., NC
p. 693 John Stuart 01201-20101-0-0
1800 Guilford Co., NC
p. 622 John Stewart 10001-01101-0-0
1800 Iredell Co., NC
p. 639 John Stuart 12101-31001-0-0
1800 Mecklenburg Co., NC
p. 604 John Stuart 42001-22110-0-0
1800 Montgomery Co., NC
p. 480 John Stuart Senr 00102-00002-0-1
1800 Richmond Co., NC
p. 266 John Stewart 00200-00001-0-0
1800 Rockingham Co., NC
p. 677 John Stewart 21010-01100-0-0
1800 Rowan Co., NC
p. 343 John Stuart 00001-00101-0-0
p. 417 John Stuart 32111-01001-0-0
1800 Surry Co., NC
p. 612 John Stuart 10001-00101-0-0
p. 613 John Stuart 32010-20100-0-0
p. 691 John Stewart 00010-00101-0-0
- We can remove John of Cabarrus, Guilford, Iredell, Mecklenburg, Montgomery, Rowan and one in Surry for being too old.
That leaves these potential matches:
1800 Richmond Co., NC
p. 266 John Stewart 00200-00001-0-0
1800 Rockingham Co., NC
p. 677 John Stewart 21010-01100-0-0
1800 Surry Co., NC
p. 613 John Stuart 32010-20100-0-0
p. 691 John Stewart 00010-00101-0-0
- We can remove John of Rockingham because he was still in Rockingham in 1810. Likewise, we can remove John of Richmond for the same reason. That leaves two in Surry to consider. Only one of those was still in Surry in 1810, seeminly the one from page 691 judging by his 1810 household. Does that mean that John of page 613 is our 1810 Haywood John? Maybe, but this does not prove it's the same person. He does have chldren born ca 1790/1800 so that fits our John of Haywood, but he has more in 1800 than our John had in 1810, so that makes it less likely to be the same person.
- There are two other John Stewarts to consider. Both were in "Upper west" SC.
1800 Greenville Dist., SC
p. 149 John Stewart 10010-20110-0-0
1800 Pendleton Dist., SC
p. 114 John Stewart 40101-42010-0-0
- Of those, John of Pendleton is too old.
- John of Greenville is a really good fit though, age-wise. He has 1 boy under 10 and two girls under 10. That works with our John of 1810 Haywood, though ours only had one girl in the equivalent age group in 1810. One cold have died, or been listed in the next column if born on the cusp. Furthermore, John of 1800 Greenville was no longer there in 1810. That means he could have moved to Haywood Co., NC by 1810.
- If, and this is a big if, John of 1800 Greenville is the same man as John of 1810 Haywood, can we conclude that he's probably *not* the son of our John and Mary Ann? I'd say so, because John of 1800 Greenville is next door to a William Stewart Senr (age 45+) and a few houses from Alexander and Joseph Stewart, both in the same age grouping as John. From proximity alone, I'd say John, Alexander and Joseph were sons of William.
- More research is needed to determine if John of 1810 Haywood is a son of our John and Mary Ann, and also what became of him after 1810;
|
1784 - Aft 1810 (> 27 years)